.jpg)
Framer and Webflow both enable designers to create websites without extensive coding, but there are significant differences between these two popular no-code platforms.
Framer vs. Webflow: An Overview
Together, Framer and Webflow represent the evolution of web design tools, making professional website creation more accessible to designers without requiring deep programming knowledge.
Framer and Webflow work by providing visual interfaces that allow users to design and launch websites with varying degrees of complexity. This enables designers to create interactive and responsive websites without writing every line of code manually. If you're a web designer, you get powerful creative tools regardless of your coding proficiency.
But while these design platforms share some fundamental capabilities, they differ in important ways that can affect your workflow, output, and final product. Framer typically offers more advanced animation and interaction capabilities with a focus on prototyping. Meanwhile, Webflow has evolved into a comprehensive website building platform with robust content management and e-commerce features that can power production websites of all sizes.
Understanding these differences is crucial for making smart platform choices that align with your design goals, technical skills, and project requirements.
Key Takeaways
- Framer excels in creating advanced animations and interactions, while Webflow offers a more comprehensive all-in-one platform for building and hosting production websites.
- Framer has a steeper learning curve but provides powerful tools for designers focused on creating highly interactive prototypes and designs.
- Webflow balances powerful design capabilities with robust CMS and e-commerce features, making it suitable for a wider range of website projects.
- Both platforms offer visual drag-and-drop interfaces, but approach website building from different angles—Framer from a design-first perspective and Webflow from a production-ready standpoint.
- The choice between platforms depends on your specific needs, with Framer better for prototype-focused work and Webflow better for end-to-end website creation.
Framer
As its name suggests, Framer emphasizes the frame-by-frame control of design elements, offering advanced animation capabilities that make creating interactive experiences more intuitive. Most designers leverage Framer's powerful motion tools to build prototypes and websites with sophisticated interactions. So, if you use Framer to create a portfolio site or product presentation, when you design animations in the editor, the platform gives you pixel-perfect control over timing, easing, and transitions.
Much of the value of Framer is in its animation and interaction capabilities:
Advanced animation provides unparalleled control over movement and transitions, with options that appeal especially to designers looking to create engaging user experiences. Because interactive elements can be tested in real-time as users design them, the prototyping process becomes more efficient and intuitive.
Note: Framer is particularly well-suited for designers coming from tools like Figma or Sketch, as its interface and workflow will feel familiar while extending capabilities into interactive prototyping and website creation.
Webflow
Webflow, developed as an all-in-one visual web development platform, works differently from Framer. Unlike Framer's focus on prototyping and interactions, Webflow operates as a comprehensive website builder where content management and production readiness take center stage. The price you pay varies based on your subscription plan and specific site requirements, but includes hosting and infrastructure management.
Many Webflow sites use the platform's robust CMS and e-commerce capabilities, trying to extend functionality while maintaining design fidelity. This approach typically makes Webflow more versatile for production websites but potentially more complex to master fully.
Some Webflow projects also leverage custom code integration—allowing developers to extend functionality beyond the visual editor's capabilities—so a hybrid approach to development is possible. That said, Webflow is generally meant for end-to-end website projects, so its features cover everything from design to deployment and ongoing management.
The first Webflow sites focused on brochure-style pages, but most now are feature-rich websites. Full-featured sites leverage Webflow's CMS capabilities, forms, and e-commerce tools. However, most websites built with Webflow can scale from simple landing pages to complex platforms because the underlying technology supports growth and expansion.
Advanced Interactions and Animations
Both platforms offer tools for creating animations and interactions, though they approach motion design differently. Framer provides exceptionally detailed control over animations, allowing for complex state transitions and micro-interactions that enhance user engagement. As your designs become more interactive, Framer gives you frame-by-frame precision.
Think of Framer's animation capabilities as professional motion graphics software for the web, where designers have granular control over every aspect of movement and timing. When animations need to feel perfectly crafted, the platform's code overrides enable unprecedented customization.
Webflow, on the other hand, offers a robust interactions panel that makes adding animations and transitions more accessible while still being powerful. Webflow's interaction tools balance ease of use with capability, allowing designers to create impressive motion effects without overwhelming complexity.
Most designers who use Webflow appreciate its practical approach to animations—typically implementing interactions that enhance user experience while maintaining site performance and ensuring animations work consistently across devices.
$335 million Webflow has raised approximately $335 million in funding as of 2022.
Key Differences Between Framer and Webflow
Framer and Webflow are both powerful no-code web design platforms offering ways to create online experiences. However, they differ in several key aspects, including core focus, learning curve, capabilities, and output.
Key Differences Between Framer and Webflow
Framer
- Core focus: Advanced animations and interactions
- Learning curve: Steeper learning curve, especially for leveraging code overrides
- Output: Excellent for prototypes and interaction-heavy websites
- CMS capabilities: Basic CMS functionality
- E-commerce: Limited e-commerce capabilities
Webflow
- Core focus: All-in-one website building platform
- Learning curve: Moderate learning curve with comprehensive learning resources
- Output: Production-ready websites with robust backend capabilities
- CMS capabilities: Sophisticated content management system
- E-commerce: Comprehensive e-commerce functionality
Core focus: Framer specializes in advanced animations, interactions, and prototyping, giving designers granular control over movement and transitions. Meanwhile, Webflow offers a more comprehensive platform for building production websites with robust CMS and e-commerce capabilities.
Learning curve: Generally, Framer has a steeper learning curve, especially for leveraging its code override capabilities and advanced animation features. Conversely, Webflow offers a more gradual learning path with extensive educational resources through Webflow University.
Output: Framer excels at creating high-fidelity prototypes and websites with sophisticated interactions, producing output that's ideal for showcasing design concepts. However, Webflow generates production-ready websites with clean code and robust backend functionality that can scale with business needs.
CMS capabilities: Webflow features a sophisticated content management system that allows for complex content structures, dynamic content, and multiple contributors. Meanwhile, Framer offers more basic CMS functionality, sufficient for simpler sites but less robust for content-heavy projects.
E-commerce: Typically, Webflow provides comprehensive e-commerce features including product management, checkout flows, and payment processing. Conversely, Framer has more limited e-commerce capabilities, requiring more workarounds for full-featured online stores.
In 2025, Framer expanded its collaboration features, allowing multiple designers to work simultaneously on projects, strengthening its position as a collaborative design platform.
Key Similarities Between Framer and Webflow
Nevertheless, Framer and Webflow share several similarities, particularly in their approach to visual web design and no-code development. Both are designed to empower designers to create websites without extensive coding knowledge. Some similarities include the following:
Similarities Between Framer and Webflow
- Design Approach: Both Framer and Webflow enable users to design visually using drag-and-drop interfaces, allowing for direct manipulation of elements on the canvas.
- Coding Knowledge: Both platforms allow users to create websites without extensive coding knowledge, though both also offer the ability to add custom code for those with programming skills.
- Responsive Design: Both Framer and Webflow create responsive websites that adapt to different screen sizes and devices, essential for modern web design.
- Custom Code: The two platforms provide options for adding custom code to extend functionality beyond what's available in the visual editor.
- Hosting: Both provide hosting solutions for published websites, allowing designers to go from concept to live site within the same platform.
- Pricing Model: Both use subscription-based pricing structures with different tiers based on features and usage requirements.
Since design capability is important to many web professionals, here's a specific comparison of the design tools between these platforms.
When Should You Choose Framer?
For designers focused on creating advanced animations and interactions, Framer offers unparalleled control and flexibility. UI/UX designers will generally appreciate Framer's powerful motion capabilities that allow for creating micro-interactions and sophisticated user experiences.
When Should You Choose Webflow?
Unless individuals need extremely complex animations or are primarily creating prototypes, Webflow offers a more comprehensive solution that bridges design and production, with powerful CMS and e-commerce capabilities that can grow with business needs.
What About Team Collaboration?
Framer provides collaboration features allowing team members to work together on designs, but Webflow offers more robust client collaboration tools, including the ability to set up client billing and manage client sites from a centralized dashboard.
The Bottom Line
Framer and Webflow have proven to be valuable tools for modern web design, each with distinct strengths. Framer typically appeals to designers focused on creating highly interactive prototypes and websites where animation quality is paramount. Framer's design-centric approach makes it particularly attractive for UI/UX designers looking to push the boundaries of web interactions.
Webflow, especially with its robust CMS and e-commerce capabilities, offers a more comprehensive solution for end-to-end website creation. While it requires learning its specific approach to web design, Webflow provides tools that bridge the gap between design and production, making it ideal for projects that need to go from concept to fully functional website. The choice between the two often comes down to your project requirements, design priorities, and whether you need a tool focused on cutting-edge interactions or comprehensive website building.